Disposed

Smt Anuradha v. Divya K

Karnataka HC15 Mar 2024MFA/1485/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Lok Adalat settled a motor-accident compensation enhancement appeal by joint memo; the insurer agreed to pay an additional lump sum of Rs.1,87,000/- to the claimant, depositable within six weeks failing 9% interest, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Enhanced compensation of Rs.1,87,000/- payable by insurer to appellant-claimant, with Tribunal award modified accordingly.

Smt Anuradha Vs Divya K — Motor Accident Claims | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 15^TH DAY OF MARCH 2024

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.G.SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA

¶7

¶8

SMT. K.T. PREMALATHA, MEMBER

¶9

M.F.A.No. 1485/2023 (MV)

¶10

(Lok Adalat No. 1490/2024)

¶11

BETWEEN:

¶12

Smt. Anuradha W/o J. Siddaraju, Aged about 63 years, R/at No.2954/25, D Block, MKK 2^nd Stage, Rajajinagar, Bangalore-10. ...APPELLANT (By Sri. H.T. Jagadeesh, Advocate)

¶13

AND

¶14

Divya K. D/o Krishnamurthy G., Major, R/at Durga Chalam, Mudilyar Street, Kalasipalyam City Market, Bangalore-02.

¶15

The Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Krushi Bhavana, 5^th and 6^th Floor, Nrupathunga Road,

¶16

¶17

Hudson Circle, Bangalore – 01, Rep. by the Manager. …RESPONDENTS

¶18

(By Sri. P.B. Raju, Advocate for R-2, Notice to R-1 – d/w v.c.o. dated 27.11.2023)

¶19

MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 16.05.2022 PASSED IN MVC NO.5097/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE 12^TH ADDL. JUDGE AND ACMM AND MACT, BENGALURU (SCCH-8), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶20

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶21

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶22

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance

¶23

Company along with its representative are present.

¶24

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive

¶25

¶26

and the respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.1,87,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Eighty Seven Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.

¶27

The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

¶28

The entire enhanced compensation shall be released in favour of the appellant / claimant, on proper identification.

¶29

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.

¶30

Sd/JUDGE

¶31

Sd/MEMBER

¶32

Rbv

Smt Anuradha v. Divya K

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Anuradha v. Divya K

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Chandrappa S Vs Sri.Raghu S.R.

Sri. Vishwanath Shetty Vs Sri. Ananda Shetty

Smt Roopa Vs Sri Purushotham B S

Mahadevappa Vs H v Nagareddy

Boregowda @ Boraiah Vs Ganesha M a

Smt. Manjulamma K Vs Subramanya P