Disposed

Ravi G M v. the Manager

Karnataka HC7 Mar 2024MFA/110/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Lok Adalat settlement of a motor accident compensation enhancement appeal. Claimant and insurer agreed to Rs.50,000 additional lump-sum over the tribunal award, payable within six weeks with 9% interest on default. Appeal disposed of per joint memo; tribunal judgment modified.

What did the court decide?

Rs.50,000 enhanced compensation awarded by consent, plus interest at 9% p.a. if not deposited within six weeks; tribunal judgment modified.

Ravi G M Vs the Manager — Insurance | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 07^TH DAY OF MARCH 2024

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.G.SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA &

¶7

SMT. K.T. PREMALATHA, MEMBER

¶8

M.F.A.No. 110/2024 (MV)

¶9

(Lok Adalat No. 1398/2024)

¶10

BETWEEN

¶11

RAVI G M

¶12

S/O MUDDALINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT GANANGURU VILLAGE,

¶13

K. SHETTAHALLI HOBLI, S.R PATNA TALUK,

¶14

MANDYA DISTRICT-571438.

¶15

...Appellant

¶16

(BY SRI. VIJAY KUMAR T, ADVOCATE)

¶17

AND

¶18

1 . THE MANAGER

¶19

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD

¶20

MICRO OFFICE S-1310/1249

¶21

MAIN ROAD, NEAR S.B.M

¶22

SRIRANGAPATNA,

¶23

MANDYA DISTRICT-571438.

¶24

¶25

2 . MANU K V S/O VEERAPPA MAJOR, R/AT KIRANGURU VILLAGE, K. SHETTAHALLI HOBLI, S.R PATNA TALUK

¶26

MANDYA DISTRICT-571438.

¶27

…Respondents (BY SRI. JANARDHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R-1, NOTICE TO R-2 – D/W V.C.O. DATED 21.02.2024)

¶28

MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 17.06.2023 PASSED IN MVC NO.1391/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MACT, SRIRANGAPATNA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶29

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶30

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶31

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present.

¶32

The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present.

¶33

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed

¶34

by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance

¶35

¶36

Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.

¶37

The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

¶38

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant / claimant, on proper identification.

¶39

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint

¶40

memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.

¶41

Sd/JUDGE

¶42

Sd/MEMBER

¶43

Rbv

Ravi G M v. the Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi G M v. the Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Muniyamma Vs T Murali Krishna

Anand M Vs M/S Bhoomika Associates

Sri. Ravi B. R. Vs Sri Kushalappa B G

Sri Chandrappa S Vs Sri.Raghu S.R.

Sri. Vishwanath Shetty Vs Sri. Ananda Shetty

Smt Roopa Vs Sri Purushotham B S