and disability certificate also corroborates x-rays taken at the time of assessment of disability which were marked as Ex.P72 and P73. But the Tribunal has not considered the disability aspect. The Trial Court assigned only reason that the evidence of P.W.2 is doubtful. But the Trial Court has not discussed as to how the Doctor evidence is doubtful. Apart from this aspect, the Tribunal has not considered the relevancy of oral evidence of P.W.1, disability certificate and x-ray sheets. In fact, the oral evidence of P.W.1 claimant, disability certificate and x-ray sheets have not been rejected. Hence, the Tribunal finding as to non-consideration of oral testimony of P.W.2 Doctor, is not in accordance with law. The Tribunal ought to have considered the disability at 22%. Considering the oral evidences of claimant, Doctor and the wound certificate and disability certificate, if 22% of permanent disability is taken into consideration, then it would meet the ends of justice. Considering the age of claimant, the multiplier applicable is 16, then the compensation under the head loss of earning due to permanent disability would be (Rs.6,500/- X 12 X 16 X 22% = Rs.2,74,560/- is awarded towards loss of future income .
