A miscellaneous first appeal filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act was dismissed as the court found that neither party appeared with instructions to prosecute the appeal.
Appeal dismissed as neither party had instructions to prosecute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S G PANDIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.100748 OF 2014 (MC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. KASHIBAI @ MALLAWWA W/O. KALLAPPA GALAGALI, AGE ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. METGUDD, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT.
(BY SRI S.B. HEBBALLI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI KALLAPPA S/O. TAMMANNAPPA GALAGALI, AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. DAVALESHWAR, TQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT.
Digitally signed by VINAYAKA B V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(BY SRI D.B. KARIGAR, ADVOCATE)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 28 OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT 1955, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.10.2013, PASSED IN MATRIMONIAL CASE NO.2/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BILAGI, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1)(1A) (1B) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT AND ETC.,
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, S G PANDIT, J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
None appears for the appellant.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has
no instructions.
It appears that both the appellant and respondent have no interest in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
BVV
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51
2 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT. KASHIBAI @ MALLAWWA W/O. KALLAPPA GALAGALI
SRI KALLAPPA S/O. TAMMANNAPPA GALAGALI
S G PANDIT
G BASAVARAJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
