The High Court of Karnataka dismissed Miscellaneous First Appeal No. 100487 of 2024 against the Land Acquisition Act award dated 2023 because the appellant failed to comply with office objections ordered within six weeks.
The appeal stands dismissed as the appellant failed to comply with office objections within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 100487 OF 2024 (LAC)
BETWEEN:
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. CHETAN MUNNOLI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
... RESPONDENTS
2
This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Section 74(1) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation And Rehabilitation Act, 2013, against the Judgment and Award dated 08TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 passed in LAC No.330/2018 on the file of the I Additional District & Sessions Judge Bagalkot to Sitting At Jamkhandi & The Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Authority, Jamkhandi.
This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Hon’ble Court passed the following;
O R D E R
Office objections to be complied with within six weeks, failing which the above appeal shall automatically stand dismissed without further orders from the court.
SD/JUDGE
//COPY//
As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 03.02.2025, the Advocate for appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this MFA No.100487 of 2024 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated 21.11.2024
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
T By: vg C By: sms
Karnataka Neeravari Nigama Limited
The Special Land Acquisition Officer
Siddu Narayan Mohite
Pandu Narayan Mohite
The State of Karnataka
C.M. Poonacha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
