13. So far as requirement of this petition is that there is a nil material to show that where he is staying, who is looking after his sustenance, what is his monthly expenses and which of the movable and immovable properties he possesses. Even though the Respondent No.3 has been placed exparte but nothing prevented him to place documents to show that what does he not possess. Simply it is not enough that if he claims that he is penniless it is no ground to hold him pauper only for the purpose of paying the Court fee. Likewise in this direction the P.W.1 was more interested in placing the materials of Respondents No.1 and 2 rather than showing before the Court that what means he possesses, and there is no material to form an opinion that whether the P.W.I has a family, if he has a family whether his wife is a working lady or if he has children whether they are major in age, whether they are working or not. Under such circumstances, without understanding the consequences and legal implications of order 33 Rule 1 of the CPC present petition has been filed. Likewise the original suit which the Petitioner wants to file, its prayers are vague and there is no valuation slip. Under such circumstances, this petition cannot be a