Tenants' revision against an eviction order under the Karnataka Rent Act was dismissed as infructuous after the parties settled the matter in Lok Adalat and possession was handed over to the landlord.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
HOUSE RENT REV. PETITION NO. 27 OF 2020 (EVI)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
PETITIONER No.1 IS THE WIDOW AND 2 AND 3 ARE CHILDREN OF LATE RADHAKRISHNA NAYAK, S/O VENKATESHA NAYAK, R/A D NO.2-17-1441, VENKATESHA KRUPA COMPOUND, OPP: BALIGA STORES, BEJAI, MANGALURU, REV. PERNRS-575003
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VASANTHA KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
MR. KITTA PRABHU S/O S LAXMANA PRABHU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
NC: 2024:KHC:577 HRRP No. 27 of 2020
R/AT D NO.2-17-1448, VENKATESH KRUPA COMPOUND, OPP: BALIGA STORES BEJAI, MANGALURU-575003
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K.S. CHANDRAHASA, ADVOCATE)
THIS HRRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 09.09.2020 PASSED IN RRP NO.18/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE D.K. MANGALORE DISMISSING THE PETITION AND CONFIRMING THE ORDER DATED 01.08.2018 PASSED IN HRC NO.36/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., MANGALURU D.K. ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.27(2) (a) AND SEC.31 OF KARNATAKA RENT ACT. 1999 FOR EVICTION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the respondent/owner filed a
memo stating that Ex.Case No.162/2019 is settled between the petitioners and respondent in Lok-Adalath and accordingly the petitioners/tenants have vacated and handed over possession to the respondent/owner and therefore the petition becomes infructuous.
NC: 2024:KHC:577 HRRP No. 27 of 2020
become infructuous.
SD/JUDGE
RD
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Bhagirathi Nayak
Shridhara Nayak
Shrinivasa Nayak
Kitta Prabhu
Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
