Civil revision petition challenging a tribunal order rejecting a temporary injunction application; the petitioner submitted that the relief no longer survived following dismissal of the underlying suit, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.365 OF 2021 (IO)
BETWEEN:
BASARUR MOHIDDIN SAHEB THE PRESIDENT, JAMIA MASJID KATAPADI KOTE VILLAGE-574105 KAUP TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ABUBACKER SHAFI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DISTRICT WAKF ADVISORY COMMITTEE UDUPI-576104.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS CRP FILED UNDER SECTION 83(9) OF WAKF TRIBUNAL ACT OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16.11.2019 PASSED ON I.A.NO.III IN OS.NO.1/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MYSURU, C/C PRESIDING OFFICER, WAKF TRIBUNAL, MYSURU, REJECTING THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULES 1 AND 2 OF CPC AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
NC: 2024:KHC:34131 CRP No. 365 of 2021
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief sought in this petition does not survive for consideration in view of dismissal of suit before the Trial Court.
Sd/(HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE
RKA
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49
Basarur Mohiddin Saheb, the President, Jamia Masjid Katapadi Kote Village
Karnataka State Board of Wakfs, rep. by its Chief Executive Officer
The Administrator (Mohammed Safwan), District Wakf Advisory Committee Udupi
Hemant Chandangoudar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
