The petitioner challenged the dismissal of an application under the Karnataka Stamp Act. The court noted that the main suit had been dismissed, rendering the revision petition infructuous. Consequently, the petition and the accompanying stay application were disposed of as infructuous.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MAY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 365 OF 2018 (SC)
BETWEEN:
MR. MOHAMMED ABDUL LATEEF, S/O MR. ABDUL JABBAR, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, PRESENTLY R/AT NO.5, II FLOOR, 'D' 3RD STREET, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 051.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAGUNATH M.D, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by NARAYANAPPA LAKSHMAMMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. SHAIK MOHAMMED AYUB KHAN, S/O LATE MR. S. MOHAMMED HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.5, I FLOOR, 'D' 3RD STREET, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 051.
REP BY HIS GPA HOLDER MR. MOHAMMED YASEEN, S/O LATE MR. S. MOHAMMED HUSAIN, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.5, I FLOOR, 'D' 3RD STREET, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 051.
…RESPONDENT
(RESPONDENT SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.18 OF KARNATAKA SMALL CAUSES COURTS ACT., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 03.07.2018 PASSED IN SC.NO.709/2017 ON THE FILE OF XVI ADDITIONAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE
NC: 2024:KHC:17707 CRP No. 365 of 2018
APPLICATION FILED UNDER SEC.33, 34 R/W SEC.58 OF KARNATAKA STAMP ACT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
following reliefs:
reads as under:
"The petitioner submits that the Court below has dismissed the suit in O.S.No.2618/2019 as such the present petition becomes infructuous."
dismissed as infructuous.
for stay does not survive for consideration and the same is disposed of.
GJM/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43 CT: BHK
Sd/JUDGE
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mr. Mohammed Abdul Lateef
Mr. Shaik Mohammed Ayub Khan
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
