Civil revision petition challenging rejection of an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint was withdrawn by the petitioner on memo; the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and held pending applications did not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 359 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SATHISHA D J., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
… RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. T PRAKASH., ADVOCATE AND SRI VENKATASWAMY, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 2.04.2024 PASSED ON IA NO.VI IN OS NO.320/2020 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NELAMANGALA., REJECTING THE IA NO.VI FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(a) R/W SEC.151 OF CPC., FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT.
NC: 2024:KHC:38031 CRP No. 359 of 2024
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition.
Pending I.As., if any, do not survive for consideration in view
of the dismissal of the main matter.
Sd/(HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE
VP
Smt. M N Sarojamma
Smt. R Revathi
Hemant Chandangoudar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
