A revision petition challenging a Karnataka Wakf Tribunal order was withdrawn by the petitioner via memo on the ground that the prayer had become infructuous; the High Court accepted the memo and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition after obtaining the will.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:20093 CRP No. 121 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 121 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
THE MANAGING COMMITTEE JAMMAL MASJID SUNNI MALEBENNUR-577530 HARIHAR TALUK, DAVANGERE DISTRICT REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT M B MOHAMMED ROSHAN.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MOHAMMED ANWAR, ADV. FOR SRI RAHAMATHULLA KOTHWAL, ADV.)
AND:
Digitally signed by NARAYANAPPA LAKSHMAMMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
NC: 2024:KHC:20093 CRP No. 121 of 2020
RESPONDENT NO.3 TO 6 ARE R/AT MALEBENNUR-577530 HARIHAR TALUK, DAVANGERE DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENTS
(NOTICE TO R1, R2 R3, R4 AND R6 SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 83(2) OF WAQF ACT 1995 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 18.01.2020 PASSED IN APPLICATION NO.11/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU C/C OF PRESIDING OFFICER, KARNATAKA WAKF TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 83(2) OF THE WAKF ACT SEEKING FOR DIRECTION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
NC: 2024:KHC:20093 CRP No. 121 of 2020
learned counsel for the petitioner and the petitioner
which reads as under:
“It is most humbly submitted as follows:
That the undersigned advocate appearing for the above named petitioner intends to withdraw the above case as the prayer becomes infructuous. Wherefore it is most respectfully prayed this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above petition with the liberty to file fresh petition on obtaining the will, in the interest of justice.”
learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
NC CT:bms List No.: 7 Sl No.: 61
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Managing Committee Jammal Masjid Sunni Malebennur, rep. by its President M B Mohammed Roshan
The Karnataka State Board of Waqfs, rep. by its Chief Executive Officer
The Enquiry Officer and Chief Law Officer, Karnataka State Board of Waqfs
Sri Mohammed Fazil
Sri Showkath Ali
Sri Ashik Ali
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
