Dismissed

B L Krishnegowda v. B S Karigowda

Karnataka HC6 Feb 2024CRL.RP/90/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

State appeal under Section 378(3) CrPC challenging a Sessions Court judgment acquitting the accused of offences under Sections 498A, 304B, 306 and 34 IPC arising from a dowry death. The High Court found no ground to interfere with the acquittal and dismissed the appeal, directing release of any amount deposited in pursuance of its earlier order.

What the court decided

AI extract

B L Krishnegowda Vs B S Karigowda — Dowry and Cruelty | Karnataka HC (2024)

��

�� ^��

��

��!��"��#��

��"��$��

��%��

��

��

��

��

��!��"��!��#��

��"��!��$�

��

Digitally signed by SUDHA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

�� %��

��"��!��$�

��

��!��#��&%��'��!��!�� (��'�&�� !��(��"�� $� �� !��'&��'�� (��#�!��!��'�� !�� (�� (��#�!� ��(�� !�!��&��'��!�"�

¶20

��"�!��#��"��"�� !��#��)�

��

��

�� +��,-./0+/,��0-1,+/"�21,-314�5673.12�80214�9,:,2,+/� 63�;1/,28�68�-1.<63413+��/1�.,*1�0.�+,:13�63�-156-4��

¶25

�� 1,-4��+��-5/0+/,��7-1./"�21,-314�5673.12�,<<1,-03=�63� ;1/,28�68��-0��/,-,+/��6>4,"�21,-314�5673.12�86-�+/1� <1+0+0631-�,34��+��,-./0+/,��0-1*,+/"�21,-314�5673.12� 86-�+/1�-1.<63413+��

¶26

&� �6+/�21,-314�5673.12.�.7;0+�+/,+�+/1�<,-+01.�/,91� .1++214�+/1�40.<7+1�,05,;2?�,34�80214�,3�,<<205,+063� 7341-��15+063�&�'�-1,4�>0+/��15+063��@��68�+/1�!641�68� !-003,2��-65147-1� 86-�./6-+�A!-��!�B$�,263=�>0+/� �15+063��68�+/1��1=6+0,;21��3.+-713+.��5+� 86-�./6-+� A��5+B$�,263=�>0+/�C603+�,8804,90+��/1�.,*1�0.�+,:13� 63�-156-4��

¶27

�� /1��1+0+0631-�,34�+/1�-1.<63413+�,-1�<-1.13+�,34� 0413+08014�;?�+/10-�-1.<15+091�5673.12.��/1�,<<205,+063�0.� 472?�.0=314�;?�+/1�<1+0+0631-"�+/1�-1.<63413+�,34�+/10-� -1.<15+091�5673.12.��,-,=-,</��6.��"�&�,34��68�+/1� ,<<205,+063�-1,4.�+/7.)�

¶28

¶29

��

¶30

A�� !"��"��# -. �$�� %��"��&��#$�� '��$��(��!)#�� $��*��"�� +��,��-��$�� !�� '��'�'�(�� !�.#��.��$�� "� �� &�� /��0�� '�� 1�&��

¶31

!�� &��"��&�� &�� 2�� "3�"��#4��-�� 5��1�� 2��1��

¶32

.��-��&�� '�� 1��41�� 6�

¶33

¶34

��

¶35

�� 3� <1-7.,2� 68� +/1� ,91-*13+.� *,41� 03� +/1�

¶36

,<<205,+063�,263=�>0+/�C603+�,8804,90+"�+/1-1�0.�36�1*;,-=6�+6� +/0.�!67-+�+6�-156-4�+/1�56*<-60.1�03�+1-.�68�.1++21*13+��+�

¶37

0.�311421..�+6�.,?�+/,+��15+063��&@�68�+/1��5+"�0.� 56*<6734,;21�03�3,+7-1��

¶38

�� 556-403=2?"��<-65114�+6�<,..�+/1�86226>03=)�

¶39

��

¶40

0$ �/1�,<<205,+063�80214�;?�;6+/�+/1�<,-+01.�0.� ,226>14�,34�+/1�!-0*03,2��190.063��1+0+063�.+,34.�

¶41

��03�+1-.�68�+/1�56<-6*0.1��

¶42

00$ �/1�C74=13+�68�563905+063�,34�6-41-�68� .13+1351� 4,+14� ��'�� <,..14� 03� !�!��6�&��'��;?�+/1�!67-+�68��1306-�!0902� (74=1�,34�(�#!�,+��-0./3,-,C<1+�,34�0+.� 56380-,+063� C74=*13+� ,34� 6-41-� 4,+14� ��'�&�<,..14�03�!-2��6��'&��'��;?� +/1�!67-+�68�+/1��440+063,2��0.+-05+�,34� �1..063.� (74=1"� �,34?,� �0++03=� ,+� �-0-,3=,<,+3,$"�,-1�.1+�,.041��

¶43

¶44

��

¶45

000$ �/1�<1+0+0631-��,557.14�0.�,5D70++14�86-�+/1� 6881351� <730./,;21� 7341-� �15+063� �&@� 68� �1=6+0,;21��3.+-7*13+.��5+��

¶46

09$ �/1��-0,2�!67-+�0.�40-15+14�+6�-121,.1�+/1�,*673+"� 03�8,967-�68�+/1�<1+0+0631-��,557.14"�03�5,.1"�,3?� ,*673+�0.�41<6.0+14�03�<7-.7,351�68�+/1�6-41-�68� +/1��<<122,+1�!67-+"�63�<-6<1-�0413+0805,+063�,34� 63�<-6475+063�68�51-+08014�56<?�68�+/1�6-41-�68� +/0.�!67-+��

¶47

9$ �,02�;634�1E157+14"�08�,3?"�.+,34.�5,3512214��

¶48

�&'(� #��

¶49

��

¶50

�0.+��6�)��2��6�)��

B L Krishnegowda v. B S Karigowda

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

B L Krishnegowda v. B S Karigowda

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Kamalamma Vs State by Amruthahalli Police Station

Shri Vijay Nair Vs Shri Rakesh Kumar Agarwal

H.T.Harish Vs K. Krishnamurthy

B M Girish Vs Sri Manohar Thadani

Dr B Poornima Vs Shanthamma

M/S C.a.Galiakotwala & Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Aura Engineering Contracts (P) Ltd.