Criminal revision petition challenging conviction in a cheque-related complaint was dismissed as non-prosecution after counsel reported the petitioner was not cooperating or giving instructions to proceed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 87 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SRI ANSAR, S/O MEHABOOB SAB, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, TWO WHEELER SELLER, R/O 6TH CROSS, SRIDHARA NAGARA, SAGARA TOWN, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577 401.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI VISHWANATH R.HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SRI MOHAMMAD GOUSE, S/O ABDUL GAFUR SAB, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, TWO WHEELER GARAGE OWNER, RESIDING 1ST CROSS, S.N.NAGARA, SAGAR TOWN, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577 401.
…RESPONDENT
(RESPONDENT SERVED)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 01.12.2023 IN CRL.A.NO.10047/2023 ON THE FILE OF V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SHIVAMOGGA AND THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.07.2023 IN C.C.NO.1103/2022 ON THE FILE OF LEARNED PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., SAGAR,, PASSED BY THE COURTS BELOW AND DISMISS THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT.
NC: 2024:KHC:50173 CRL.RP No. 87 of 2024
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER
Sri Vishwanath R.Hegde, learned counsel for revision petitioner is present through video conferencing. He submits that interim order could not be complied on account of total non-cooperation from the revision petitioner. He also submits that the efforts made by him to contact the revision petitioner through the briefing counsel also did not yield any positive result and revision petitioner is not instructing to proceed with the case.
Placing the submission on record, the revision petition is
dismissed as non-prosecution.
Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
CPN
Sri Ansar
Sri Mohammad Gouse
V Srishananda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
