Six criminal revision petitions challenging conviction and appellate judgments were withdrawn after counsel filed a memo stating the matter was settled outside court; the High Court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 07TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.64 OF 2022
C/W
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.66 OF 2022 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.70 OF 2022 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.71 OF 2022 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.75 OF 2022 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.96 OF 2022
IN CRL. RP No.64/2022
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. JAYANTH KRISHNA B S.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
R/AT LAKSHMI NILAYA, VIDYANAGAR 2ND CROSS, TUMKUR CITY 572101
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RUDRESHA., ADVOCATE FOR R1 R2,R3 & R4 SERVED)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET SIDE THE JUDGMENT PASSED IN C.C.NO.4639/2010 BY THE V ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., TUMAKURU DATED 07.02.2020 AND JUDGMENT PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.29/2020 BY THE II ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, TUMAKURU DATED 31.07.2021 RESPECTIVELY AND THEREBY PASS AN ORDER DISMISS THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 HEREIN AND RESULTING IN ACQUITTAL OF THE PETITIONER AS CONSEQUENCE THEREOF IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND ETC.
IN CRL. RP No.66/2022
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. JAYANTH KRISHNA B S.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
NC: 2024:KHC:20841 CRL.RP No. 64 of 2022 C/W CRL.RP No. 66 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 70 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 71 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 75 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 96 of 2022
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RUDRESHA., ADVOCATE FOR R1 R2,R3 & R4 SERVED)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENTS PASSED IN C.C.NO.4640/2010 BY THE V ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., TUMAKURU DATED 07.02.2020 AND JUDGMENT PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.30/2020 BY THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, TUMAKURU DATED 31.07.2021 RESPECTIVELY AND THEREBY BY PASS AN ORDER DISMISS THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 HEREIN AND RESULTING IN ACQUITTAL OF THE PETITIONER AS CONSEQUENCE THEREOF IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND ETC.
IN CRL. RP No.70/2022
BETWEEN:
NC: 2024:KHC:20841 CRL.RP No. 64 of 2022 C/W CRL.RP No. 66 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 70 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 71 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 75 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 96 of 2022
S/O LATE K M BUDDANNA NOW AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/AT 733/2, VIDYAPEETA ROAD, KENGERI, BENGALURU 560 060
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. JAYANTH KRISHNA B S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
NC: 2024:KHC:20841 CRL.RP No. 64 of 2022 C/W CRL.RP No. 66 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 70 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 71 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 75 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 96 of 2022
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT NO. 285, ANEKERE STREET, 8TH CROSS VIJAYANAGARA, KENGERI BENGALURU 560 060
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RUDRESHA., ADVOCATE FOR R1 R2,R3 & R4 ARE SERVED)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET SIDE THE JUDGMENT PASSED IN BY THE TRIAL COURT BELOW DATED 07.02.2020 AND JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE 1ST APPELLATE COURT DATED 31.07.2021 RESPECTIVELY AND THEREBY PASS AN ORDER DISMISS THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 HEREIN AND RESULTING IN ACQUITTAL OF THE PETITIONER AS CONSEQUENCE THEREOF IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND ETC.
IN CRL. RP No.71/2022
BETWEEN:
S/O LATE BUDDANNA
NOW AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
R/AT 733/2, VIDYAPEETA ROAD,
KENGERI, BENGALURU 560 060
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. JAYANTH KRISHNA B S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
S/O SRI SACHIDANANDA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT LAKSHMI NILAYA, VIDYANAGAR 2ND CROSS, TUMKUR CITY 572101
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RUDRESHA., ADVOCATE FOR R1
R2,R3 & R4 ARE SERVED)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT PASSED IN CRL.A. NO.28/2020 BY THE II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, TUMKURU DATED 31.07.2021 AND JUDGMENT PASSED IN C.C. NO.4638/2010 BY THE V ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TUMKURU DATED 07.02.2020 RESPECTIVELY AND THEREBY PASS AN APPROPRIATE ORDER THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 HEREIN AND RESULTING IN ACQUITTAL OF THE PETITIONER AS CONSEQUENCE THEREBY IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND ETC.
IN CRL. RP No.75/2022
BETWEEN:
S/O LATE K M BUDDANNA NOW AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/AT 733/2, VIDYAPEETA ROAD, KENGERI, BENGALURU 560 060
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. JAYANTH KRISHNA B S.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
NC: 2024:KHC:20841 CRL.RP No. 64 of 2022 C/W CRL.RP No. 66 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 70 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 71 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 75 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 96 of 2022
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RUDRESHA., ADVOCATE FOR R1 R2,R3 & R4 ARE SERVED)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.27/2020 BY THE II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, TUMKURU DATED 31.07.2021 AND JUDGMENT PASSED IN C.C.NO.4637/2010 BY THE V ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TUMKURU DATED 07.02.2020 RESPECTIVELY AND THEREBY PASS AN APPROPRIATE ORDER NO.2 THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 HEREIN AND RESULTING IN ACQUITTAL OF THE PETITIONER AS CONSEQUENCE THEREOF IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND ETC.
NC: 2024:KHC:20841 CRL.RP No. 64 of 2022 C/W CRL.RP No. 66 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 70 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 71 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 75 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 96 of 2022
IN CRL. RP No.96/2022
BETWEEN:
S/O LATE K M BUDDANNA NOW AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/AT 733/2, VIDYAPEETA ROAD, KENGERI, BENGALURU 560 060
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. JAYANTH KRISHNA B S.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
NC: 2024:KHC:20841 CRL.RP No. 64 of 2022 C/W CRL.RP No. 66 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 70 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 71 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 75 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 96 of 2022
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RUDRESHA., ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS CRL.RP FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT PASSED IN CRL.A.No.31/2020 BY THE II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, TUMKURU DATED 31.07.2021 AND JUDGMENT PASSED IN C.C.NO.4641/2010 BY THE V ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TUMKURU DATED 07.02.2020 RESPECTIVELY AND THEREBY PASS AN APPROPRIATE ORDER NO.2 THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 HEREIN AND RESULTING IN ACQUITTAL OF THE PETITIONER AS CONSEQUENCE THEREOF IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND ETC.
THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
NC: 2024:KHC:20841 CRL.RP No. 64 of 2022 C/W CRL.RP No. 66 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 70 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 71 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 75 of 2022 CRL.RP No. 96 of 2022
ORDER
Sri B.S.Jayanth Krishna, learned counsel has filed vakalath for petitioner with No Objection from the previous counsel and files a memo, which reads as under:
“It is submitted that the above matter is settled outside the Court. Hence, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the above petition as withdrawn.
WHEREFORE, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleaded to take this memo on record and pass necessary orders in the interest of justice and equity.”
In view of the memo, revision petitions are dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
kcm
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Ramadas
Sri Yogesh Kumar
Smt. Rekha
Sri Ranganath M
Sri Ramesh K R
V Srishananda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
