police brought the accused No.1 and they took the signature and also taken photograph. The photo was not taken at the spot. No doubt the photo -Ex.P3 discloses that the accused is found in the photograph and with regard to the seizure is concerned, PW1 and PW2 have not supported the case of the prosecution and only the evidence of PW3 to P6 remains since PW1 says he cannot say what has been seized at the spot. The PW2 also says that he cannot say what has been seized at the spot. Now, the Court has to consider the evidence of PW3 to PW6, the PW3 is Head constable, he also says that when they went to the spot, public who were consuming the liquor, they ran away from the spot. The accused No.1 apprehended at the spot and also seized an amount of Rs.460/- at the spot. In the cross-examination, PW3 says that regarding his part of the raid and seizure, he categorically admits that he has not given any such statement before the investigating officer, though he claims that he himself and one Kumar apprehended the accused No.1 and in this regard also he has not stated specifically about the
