appellate Court has made an observation with regard to the loss of sugarcane crop and also discussed in paragraph Nos.26 and 27 of the judgment of the appellate Court with regard to sustaining damage to the tune of Rs.1,60,000/- in view of mischief and also in paragraph No.26, taking note of SubSection 2 of Section 357A of Cr.P.C. and also in paragraph No.28, with regard to the loss suffered by the victim to the tune of Rs.1,60,000/- as observed that even the acquittal of the accused is not a ground and hence, in my opinion, it is just and necessary to make a report to Hon’ble Chairman, DLSA to consider the plea of the victim under Section 357A for awarding victim compensation scheme and also in the operative portion given direction to submit a copy of the judgment to the Hon’ble Chairman, DLSA, Ramanagara to consider the plea of the complainant under Section 357A of Cr.P.C. The First Appellate Court has applied its mind with regard to the mischief as well as loss incurred by the revision petitioner on account of mischief by setting fire. The victim-complainant having suffered loss to the tune of Rs.1,60,000/- and such direction was given and also no material report that whether any decision was taken by DLSA, Ramanagara. Hence, it is
