application in 2023, no documents stood in the name of the petitioner, either insurance or permanent registration certificate. There was a delay of 1119 days in filing the appeal and the same is not properly explained by the petitioner. The order was passed by the Deputy Conservator of Forest on 04.02.2020 and criminal appeal is filed in 2023 after three years. When such being the case, when the documents are not placed before the Appellate Court and when there is no insurance and permanent registration certificate in favour of the petitioner and also when the petitioner did not disclose the name of the accused/driver who was using the vehicle at the time of seizure of the vehicle and also taking note of the fact that the vehicle was purchased and immediately the same was used for illegal transportation of rosewood billets, I do not find any error committed by the Appellate Court in rejecting the application. The Appellate Court taken note of the said fact into consideration in paragraph Nos.14 and 15 and assigned the reasons. No doubt, the charge-sheet is not yet filed. This petitioner did not disclose the details to whom he had entrusted the vehicle. When such being the case, it is not a
