Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Smt Bharathi Vs Smt S Bhagya — Karnataka HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

Home
Karnataka HC
2024
Smt Bharathi Vs Smt S BhagyaSmt Bharathi v. Smt S Bhagya

Dismissed

Smt Bharathi v. Smt S Bhagya

Karnataka HC13 Feb 2024CRL.RP/1047/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; no adjournment sought despite the matter being called.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

1 -

��

�� ^��

��

��!��"��#��

��"��$��

��%��

��

��

��

Digitally signed by SUDHA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

��^��

��

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Karnataka HC
Decided on: 13 Feb 2024 · February
Registered: 9 Oct 2017
Case no.: CRL.RP/1047/2017

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from S Rachaiah

Sri L Kumarkale Vs Sri G v Narasimhaiah
12 Feb 2024
Sri P Jayaprakash Vs Smt Kavitha
12 Feb 2024
Miss B N Anitha Vs Smt Jyothi N
12 Feb 2024
State of Karnataka Vs Kum T R Hamsa
13 Feb 2024

Cite this judgement

Smt Bharathi v. Smt S Bhagya, CRL.RP/1047/2017 (KA), decided on 13 February 2024.

The High Court of Karnataka publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The petition was listed but neither counsel appeared nor was adjournment sought; the court accordingly dismissed the petition for non-prosecution. The text is largely OCR-corrupted and no other holdings are legible.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

!��

"��#�"��#�

��

��

��$��

�� %^��

��

!��

"��&��'��&��#�"��#�

��(��% �� '�� %��$% ��$% ��(��(��)� ��'�� '�� %�� %�$% �� (� '�� $% *��

��(�� (��+�

��

2 -

��

�,-�./00-1�2/3�4530-6�781�759/4�,-/159:�;-781-�0,-� <881659/0-��-9<,�/96�0,-��8=81659/0-��-9<,�533>-6�9805<-�08� 0,-�1-3?-<05@-�?/105-3�781�0,-51�/??-/1/9<-��82-@-1��0,-�?845<-� 5905./0589�53�1-<-5@-6�30/059:�0,/0�AA/661-33--�980�78>96�59�0,-� 3/56�/661-33��

$�� 89356-159:�0,-�3/.-��50�53�/??18?15/0-�08�653.533�

0,-�?-050589�781�989=?183-<>0589��

�<<81659:4B��0,-�?-050589�53�653.533-6�781�989=?183-<>0589��

�&'(� #��

'��

�530��8�+� ��4��8�+��

CNR

KAHC010427242017

Bench

Disposal

Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

Sri Kishan @ Kishan Nataraj (A4) Vs State of Karnataka by

13 Feb 2024

Sri K N Gangadhara Vs Smt Sarojamma

13 Feb 2024