Anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. arising from offences under Sections 420 and 376 IPC. With no representation for the petitioner at any stage, the High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.955 OF 2024 (438)
BETWEEN:
SRI. VEDANT PATHAK, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, S/O. ASHISH PATHAK, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT FIRST FLOOR 628, BHUSHINI HSR SECTOR-6, BANGALORE-560 102,
PERMANENT RESIDENT AT NO.122 MID RISE, SILVER SPRING PHASE-I, RALAMANDAL, INDORE, MADHYA PRADESH-452 020.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VASANTH KUMAR .N, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by SOWMYA D
Location: High Court of Karnataka
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY HSR LAYOUT P.S., BANGALORE, REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. B.LAKSHMANA, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P FILED U/S 438 CR.P.C., PRAYING TO GRANT ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN THE EVENT OF ARREST FROM THE RESPONDENT POLICE OF HSR LAYOUT, BANGALORE,
REGISTERED BY THE LIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS SPECIAL JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH-54) IN CRL.MISC.NO.12776/2023 U/S 420 AND 376 OF IPC AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
There is no representation on behalf of the
petitioner.
interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
MS* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38
3 provisions across 2 enactments
SRI. VEDANT PATHAK
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY HSR LAYOUT P.S., BANGALORE
RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
