Lokesha K M v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal petition seeking quashment of proceedings for MMRD Act and IPC offences was dismissed for default as counsel remained absent and failed to comply with office objections despite repeated orders.
What the court decided
- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:16029 CRL.P No. 901 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 901 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
LOKESHA K.M. W/O. KRISHNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS KARADAHALLI VILLAGE MUDALLAMELLHALLI POST NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 432.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. ARUN G., ADVOCATE – (ABSENT))
AND:
STATE BY BINDIGANAVILE POLICE MANDYA – 571 432
REPRESENTED BY STATE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT COMPLEX
Digitally signed by D HEMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Lokesha K.M.
- respondent
State by Bindiganavile Police, Mandya
Coram
K.Natarajan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.P/901/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court