Sri. Prashanth Rai v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner appeared in absentia seeking bail. Court observed counsel repeatedly failed to appear and dismissed the application for default.
Petitioner appeared in absentia seeking bail. Court observed counsel repeatedly failed to appear and dismissed the application for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:43477 CRL.P No. 8798 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8798 OF 2024 (439(Cr.PC) /
483(BNSS)-)
BETWEEN:
SRI. PRASHANTH RAI S/O. BALAKRISHNA RAI, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT PATLADKA HOUSE, PADAVANNUR VILLAGE, PUTTUR TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT - 574 313.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHETTY DEEPAK, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by VEDAVATHI A K Location: High Court of Karnataka
STATE BY PUTTUR RURAL POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, BENGALURU - 560 009.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. M. M. WAHEEDA, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 483 BNNS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN SPL.C.C.NO.5014/2022 (CR.NO.101/2021) ON THE FILE OF V ADDL. DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE, D.K. MANGALURU, SITTING AT PUTTUR, REGISTERED BY THE PUTTUR RURAL POLICE STATION, FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 120B, 364, 302, 397, 201 R/W SEC. 34 OF IPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
NC: 2024:KHC:43477 CRL.P No. 8798 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner remained absent. Though learned counsel passed over the matter at 12.00 p.m., but later when the case was called at 2.37 p.m., at 4.01 p.m., and once again at 4.54 p.m., learned counsel for the petitioner remained. absent.
Even on the last date of hearing also, learned counsel for the petitioner remained absent, which shows petitioner counsel is not interested in pursuing the matter.
Hence, this petition is dismissed for default.
Sd/(K.NATARAJAN) JUDGE
AKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3 CT:SK
Sri. Prashanth Rai S/o. Balakrishna Rai
State
K. Natarajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court