Dismissed

Mr.Parthasarathy Sampathkumar v. Zuri Energy Pvt. Ltd.

Karnataka HC3 Jun 2024CRL.P/862/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., the petitioners sought to quash an order regarding the registration of a case for cheque bouncing. The court recorded the petitioners' memo seeking withdrawal on the grounds that the matter is now infructuous and disposed of the petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn.

Mr.Parthasarathy Sampathkumar Vs Zuri Energy Pvt… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC:18825 CRL.P No. 862 of 2023

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 3^RD DAY OF JUNE, 2024

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 862 OF 2023

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

MR. PARTHASARATHY SAMPATHKUMAR AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS S/O MR. SAMPATHKUMAR R., DIRECTOR, HINDUSTAN TURBO MACHINERY LTD., NO.40-B, 2^ND PHASE, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA BENGALURU – 560 005

¶10

ALSO AT: 56, MALOLA BHAVANAM 6^TH CROSS, NANJAPPA GARDEN BABUSAPALYA BENGALURU – 560 043.

¶11

Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

MR. DEVAKI PARTHASARATHY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS W/O MR. PARTHASARATHY SAMPATHKUMAR DIRECTOR, HINDUSTAN TURBO MACHINERY LTD., NO.40-B, 2^ND PHASE, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA BENGALURU – 560 005

¶13

ALSO AT: 562, BABUSAHEB PALYA BENGALURU – 560 043.

¶14

…PETITIONERS

¶15

(BY SRI. DHARMAPAL, ADVOCATE)

¶16

AND:

¶17

ZURI ENERGY PVT. LTD., HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT:

¶18

¶19

NC: 2024:KHC:18825 CRL.P No. 862 of 2023

¶20

C/O THE ZURI VARCA, GOA WHITE SANDS RESORT AND CASINO, VARCA BEACH, VARCA SALCETE GOA – 403 721 REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR. ASHISH SHAH

¶21

ALSO HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE AT: 244, HOODY VILLAGE, RAJAPALYA, ITPL ROAD WHITEFIELD, BENGALURU – 560 048.

¶22

…RESPONDENT

¶23

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF THE CR.P.C., PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 24.06.2013 FOR HAVING REGISTERED CASE AGAINST THE PETITIONERS AS ACCUSED NO.5 AND 6 IN C.C.NO.50645/2013 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF THE N.I ACT WHICH IS NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF LEARNED SCCH-5 VIII ADDL. JUDGE AT BENGALURU.

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶25

ORDER

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioners file a memo seeking

¶27

permission to withdraw the petition as it has become infructuous.

¶28

The memo of withdrawal reads as follows:

¶29

“The Petitioner submits as that Judgment has been passed in the Main case/ Complaint. Hence the above petitioner has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn, in the interest of Justice.”

¶30

NC: 2024:KHC:18825 CRL.P No. 862 of 2023

¶31

¶32

The memo is taken on record. The Criminal Petition is

¶33

disposed in terms of the memo.

¶34

Sd/JUDGE

¶35

NVJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32 CT:SS

Mr.Parthasarathy Sampathkumar v. Zuri Energy Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr.Parthasarathy Sampathkumar v. Zuri Energy Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Anurag Jain Vs the Union of India

Mahammad Shiyab S Vs National Investigation Agency

S Vinay Vs State by Kodige Halli Police

Sri. Meharaj Sharif Vs State of Karnataka

Mr. Saifulla Baig, Vs State of Karnataka

The State by R.T.Nagar and Vs Syed Niyaz