Petitioner sought quashing of a CBI FIR alleging criminal conspiracy and corruption offences. Counsel absent repeatedly and office objections unaddressed; petition dismissed for non-compliance.
None; dismissal for non-compliance of office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:46733 CRL.P No. 759 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 759 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
SRI. RAMESH B GOWDA S/O BOMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.325/1, 5TH CROSS 14TH MAIN ROAD, RMV EXTENSION SADASHIVANAGAR BENGALURU-560 080 DIRECTOR M/S GREENS ORGANICS INDIA PVT LTD
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHRUTHI S P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by KRISHNAPPA LAXMI YASHODA
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
NC: 2024:KHC:46733 CRL.P No. 759 of 2022
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR (VIDE ANNEXURE-A) BEARING NO.RC0372020A0016 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S.120B R/W SEC.420,409,477-A OF IPC, 1860 AND SEC.13(2) R/W SEC.13(1)(d) OF PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT 1988 AGAINST THE PETITIONER PENDING BEFORE THE LEARNED XXI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE SESSIONS AND PRINCIPAL SPECIAL JUDGE FOR CBI CASES, BENGALURU REGISTERED BEFORE THE RESPONDENT IN CASE NO.RC.16(A)/2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation.
under:
"Learned Counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation.
The petition is of the year 2022. Matter is listed for the third time for compliance of office objections. Still there is no progress in the matter. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition.
NC: 2024:KHC:46733 CRL.P No. 759 of 2022
Finally, as a last chance, a week's time is granted to comply with the office objections.
matter. The petition is of the year 2022. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition.
Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance
of office objections.
Sd/(M G UMA) JUDGE
KLY CT: JL
7 provisions across 3 enactments
Ramesh B Gowda
Central Bureau of Investigation, ACB
G.E. Basanth Chakravarthy
M G Uma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
