Dismissed

Pravenn Kumar Alias Praveena v. State of Karnataka by

Karnataka HC27 Nov 2024CRL.P/6815/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail petition filed under S. 438 Cr.P.C. The petition was adjourned multiple times for compliance of office objections. The court noted repeated non-appearance or representation by the petitioners and dismissed the matter for non-prosecution.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to repeated failure to appear or seek representation.

Pravenn Kumar Alias Praveena Vs State of Karnataka by — Bail and Remand | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC:48680 CRL.P No. 6815 of 2024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 27^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6815 OF 2024

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

PRAVENN KUMAR @ PRAVEENA S/O LATE SIDDARAJU AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT MARALEBEKUPPE VILLAGE UYYAMBALLI HOBLI KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 117.

¶10

SHIVAKUMAR @ SHIVA S/O KUPPUSWAMY AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS /AT MULLAHALLI VILLAGE KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT PIN - 562 117.

¶11

…PETITIONERS

¶12

Digitally signed by NANDINI MS Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶13

(BY SRI NAGARAJA V, ADV.)

¶14

AND:

¶15

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY RAMANAGARA RURAL POLICE STATION REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE.

¶16

…RESPONDENT

¶17

(BY SRI RAHUL RAI K, HCGP)

¶18

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 438 CR.PC PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE BAIL OF THE PETITIONERS IN CR.NO.77/2020 AND C.C.NO.110/2020 FOR AN ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 397 OF IPC, FILED BY THE RESPONDENT POLICE OF RAMANAGARA RURAL POLICE STATION, WHICH IS NOW PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE COURT OF

¶19

¶20

NC: 2024:KHC:48680 CRL.P No. 6815 of 2024

¶21

THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, AT RAMANAGARA AND PASS SUCH OTHER RELIEF'S AS RE JUST AND NECESSARY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

Matter called twice. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. This petition is posted before this Court for the sixth time for the purpose of compliance of office objections. Order sheet maintained by this Court would reveal that on the last several dates of hearing also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Therefore, this Court is left with no other alternative, but to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶25

Sd/(S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE

¶26

Pravenn Kumar Alias Praveena v. State of Karnataka by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pravenn Kumar Alias Praveena v. State of Karnataka by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr Krishnamurthy H M Vs State of Karnataka

Naveen a Vs State of Karnataka by

Karthika Vs State of Karnataka by Ramapura Poliice Station

Prashant @ Prashanth Suresh Vs the State of Karnataka

Ibrahim Arshad v K., Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. Aditya Kumar Vs State by Deputy Superintendent of Excise