The petition praying to quash an FIR registered against the petitioner for offences under IPC sections 498(a), 323, 504 and DP Act was withdrawn by the counsel. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:41954 CRL.P No. 6802 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6802 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SRI KEMPEGOWDA M.N S/O LATE NAGARAJE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT 28, 1ST B MAIN ROAD 4TH C CROSS SRIGANDHA NAGARA NEAR KTG SCHOOL HEGGANAHALLI CROSS VISHWANIDAM POST BENGALURU - 560 091.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI RAGHU M.N, ADV.)
AND:
Digitally signed by NANDINI MS Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R-1; SRI V. ANAND, ADV., FOR R-2)
NC: 2024:KHC:41954 CRL.P No. 6802 of 2024
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE REGISTRATION OF QUASHING FIR BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN FIR IN CR.NO.46/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE NORTH WOMEN POLICE STATION/Ist RESPONDENT AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE P/US/ 498(a),323,504 OF IPC R/W SEC.3 AND 4 OF DP ACT PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 32nd ACMM NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BENGLAURU WHICH IS REGISTERED IN PURSUANCE OF TO STALL THE ABUSE OF PROCESS OF COURT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
ORAL ORDER
Sd/(S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE
DN
1 issue framed by the court
Should the Criminal Petition praying to quash the FIR be dismissed as withdrawn?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Sri Kempegowda M.N
State of Karnataka
Smt. Priyanka G.R
S VishwaJith Shetty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
