also, cannot be construed as permission obtained as per Section 155 (1) of Cr.P.C. On the other hand, it reveals it is nothing but authorization for conducting raid or a warrant for conducting raid, search and raid, as per proviso to Section 81 of Karnataka Police Act. Wherein, the proviso says that before conducting search and seizure of the gaming house or any place, the police officer shall obtain warrant or permission of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate or Commissioner of Police, or ACP or DySP as the case may be under the limit of Commissioner or Sub Jurisdictional Magistrate or a Magistrate or DySP in respect of the Rural District. The proviso says the warrant cannot be authorized by the Commissioner of police, Deputy commissioner of police,, ACP or police or Magistrate or Superintendent of Police, for conducting the raid. The permission granted by the Magistrate is only nothing but a permission accorded for conducting raid, but not registering FIR and filing the charge sheet. Such being the case, it is a clear case of violation of section 155 (2) of Cr.P.C., which is a
