A criminal petition seeking quashing of a private complaint and cognizance taken under Sections 177 and 120(B) IPC was disposed as infructuous after the respondent-complainant withdrew the complaint before the concerned court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:36050 CRL.P No. 5152 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5152 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by KAVYA G Location: High Court of Karnataka
NC: 2024:KHC:36050 CRL.P No. 5152 of 2022
AREKAD POST, VIA SIDAPUR, KODAGU DISTRICT 571 243
…PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. LEELA P DEVADIGA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. THEJESH P, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. AJESH KUMAR S., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
NC: 2024:KHC:36050 CRL.P No. 5152 of 2022
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRIVATE COMPLAINT IN P.C.R.NO.149/2021 NOW C.C.NO.1322/2021 FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT, PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., MADIKERI, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 15.07.2021 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., MADIKERI IN TAKING COGNIZANCE OF THE OFFENCE P/U/S 177 R/W 120(B) OF IPC AS WELL AS THE ORDER DATED 27.09.2021 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., MADIKERI IN ISSUING SUMMONS TO THE PETITIONERS FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 177 AND 34 OF IPC AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT THERETO, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-B, RESPECTIVELY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
This Court on 08.08.2024 has passed the following
order on the submission of the learned counsel for the respondent:
"This Court on 29.07.2024, had passed the following order:
"Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 submits that complainant is wanting to
withdraw the complaint. The submission is placed on record"
Learned counsel Sri.Ajesh Kumar S., submits that the respondent - complainant is in Delhi and would comply with the order (supra), if two weeks time is granted.
List this matter on 04.09.2024."
Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that complaint before the concerned Court itself is withdrawn.
In that light, petition is rendered infructuous and
it is disposed as having become infructuous.
Sd/(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
BVK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Pushpa Kuttanna
Sri. Mandepanda A Kuttanna
Sri. B.S. Sunil
Sri. C.P. Subash
Sri. C.P. Nanda
M/s Rathana Commercial Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
M.Nagaprasanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
