Disposed

Ananda Kumara D R v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC2 Sept 2024CRL.P/5136/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed to quash FIR based on complaint involving offences under Sections 498A, 504, 506, 323, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act. Court disposed of petition upon counsel seeking withdrawal due to pending charge sheet, granting liberty to challenge charge sheet.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed on withdrawal; liberty granted to challenge charge sheet during pendency.

Ananda Kumara D R Vs State of Karnataka — Quashing and FIR | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

1 - NC: 2024:KHC:35548 CRL.P No. 5136 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2^ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5136 OF 2024

¶5

BETWEEN:

¶6

ANANDA KUMARA D.R., RAMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,

¶7

DODDAMANDIGANAHALLI VILLAGE,

¶8

KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN – 573 217.

¶9

Digitally signed by KAVYA G Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶10

KOMALA @ PARVATHAMMA, W/O NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, VIJAYANAGARA EXTENTION, 4^TH CROSS, HASSAN TOWN, HASSAN – 573 217.

¶11

(BY SRI. KIRAN KUMAR P., ADVOCATE)

¶12

…PETITIONERS

¶13

AND:

¶14

STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY HASSAN WOMEN POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY S.P.P., HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE – 560 001.

¶15

AKSHATHA B.K., W/O ANAND KUMAR R.,

¶16

¶17

NC: 2024:KHC:35548 CRL.P No. 5136 of 2024

¶18

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, DODDAMANDIGANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN – 573 217.

¶19

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.JAGADEESHA B.N., ADDL. S.P.P., FOR R1)

¶20

THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.15/2024 PENDING ON THE FILE OF VII ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND J.M.F.C. COURT, HASSAN DISTRICT INITIATED AS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS BY RESPONDENT NO.1 HASSAN WOMEN POLICE STATION BASED ON THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 498A, 504, 506, 323, 34 OF IPC R/W SEC. 3, 4 OF DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT.

¶21

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners

¶25

submits that during the pendency of the petition charge sheet has been filed against the petitioners. Hence, he would seek leave of this court to withdraw the petition

¶26

¶27

NC: 2024:KHC:35548 CRL.P No. 5136 of 2024

¶28

reserving liberty to raise challenge to the charge sheet so

¶29

filed during the pendency of the petition.

¶30

Liberty so sought is granted.

¶31

Accordingly, petition stands disposed of in the

¶32

aforesaid terms.

¶33

Sd/(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

¶34

BVK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20

Ananda Kumara D R v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ananda Kumara D R v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhishek Singh Vs State of Karnataka

Mr R Gopal Reddy Vs Mr. Mohammed Mukaram

Sri Vikram Ballari Vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Arokya Das @ Das Chinna Cowry Chinna @ Chinna Savari Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Lakshmi Narayana Vs State of Karnataka

Ravi Richard D Souza, Vs State by Kavoor P.S.