Anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with Crime No.106/2024; counsel submitted the petitioner had already been apprehended and sought dismissal as infructuous. The court accepted the submission and dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5107 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONERS
Digitally signed by YAMUNA K L Location: High Court of Karnataka
(BY SRI. PRASANNA V R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BANNURU POLICE STATION, T. NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT, REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BANGALORE 560 001
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. RAHUL RAI K., HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.438 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO DIRECT THE POLICE THAT IN THE EVENT OF THEIR ARREST IN CR.NO.106/2024 REGISTERED IN BANNUR POLICE STATION, T.NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT, FOLLOWED WITH FILING OF FIR DATED 11.04.2024 BEFORE THE LEARNED PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, T.NARASIPURA, THEY MAY BE ENLARGED ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL ON SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS DEEMED FIT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is already apprehended and therefore, he prays for dismissal of the petition, as the same is rendered infructuous.
2. The submission is accepted.
become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Revanna B
Girisha H R
State of Karnataka by Bannur Police Station
M G Uma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
