Bail petition under Section 439 CrPC for an offence under Section 395 IPC. Counsel for the petitioner was absent even on second call; the court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution without deciding the bail claim.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 500 OF 2024 (439)
BETWEEN:
MUZAMIL RAHIMAN S/O. LATE FAROOQ AHMAD, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT 17TH CROSS, B.S.A. ROAD, TANY ROAD, NEAR MASTANIYA DARGA, K.G. HALLY, BANGALORE-560 045.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. HARISH KUMAR H C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BAGALURU P. S. Digitally signed REP. BY SPP by SOWMYA D HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, Location: High BANGALORE-560 001. Court of Karnataka (BY SRI. K.NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP.)
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.439 CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.277/2023 REGISTERED BY BAGALURU POLICE STATION, BENGALURU DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 395 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., DEVANAHALLI.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
NC: 2024:KHC:8644 CRL.P No. 500 of 2024
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present
even during the second call. Hence, the petition is
dismissed for non-prosecution .
Sd/JUDGE
SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Muzamil Rahiman
State of Karnataka by Bagaluru P.S.
Rajendra Badamikar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
