The court dismissed the bail petition because the petitioner's counsel was absent, no representation was made, and the office objections regarding process fee were not complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 488 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
ULLAS S/O SHIVASHANKAR, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 68, GROUND FLOOR, BEHIND ANJANEYA SWAMY TEMPLE, 31ST MAIN ROAD, SAKKAMMA EXTENSION, LAKSHMIDEVINAGAR, LAGGERE, BANGALORE - 560 058.
Digitally signed by YAMUNA K L Location: High Court of Karnataka
NATIVE PLACE: ULLAS, S/O SHIVASHANKAR, R/A NEAR RAMALINGESHWARA TEMPLE, FIROOZABADH VILLAGE, GULBARGA TALUK AND DISTRICT - 585 308.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NAGARAJA K.R, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
…RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN SPL.C.C.NO.2511/2023, FTSC-2 (CR.NO.311/2023) OF NANDINI LAYOUT P.S., BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 376(2)(N) OF IPC AND SEC.5(L) AND 6 OF POCSO ACT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No
representation.
In view of the above, petition is dismissed .
Sd/JUDGE
GPG CT: BHK
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Ullas s/o Shivashankar
State
Kum. Bhuvaneswari
M G Uma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
