The court dismissed the criminal petition for quashing proceedings as infructuous because the charge sheet had been filed in the trial court and the petitioner had failed to comply with office objections for years.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3966 OF 2018
BETWEEN:
SRI. SHRAVAN SHETTY AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, S/O SHANTHARAM SHETTY, NEDUKODU, SAMPIGEDI, ULLOOR 74, UDUPI DISTRICT -576101
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KIRAN R., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by YAMUNA K L Location: High Court of Karnataka
STATE OF KARNATAKA, SHANKARANAYANA POLICE STATION, KUNDAPURA CIRCLE, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, BENGALURU - 560 001
…RESPONDENT (BY SMT. ASMA KOUSER, ADD.SPP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CRIME NO.50/2018, REGISTERED BY THE SHANKARANAYANA POLICE, KUNDAPURA, UDUPI DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 379 OF IPC AND SECTIONS 4,4(1A),21OF MINES AND MINERALS REGULATION OF DEVELOPMENT ACT, AND UNDER SECTION 43(2),44,3(1),42(1) OF KARNATAKA MINOR MINERAL CONCESSION RULES.
NC: 2024:KHC:36741 CRL.P No. 3966 of 2018
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No
representation.
4. Submission is accepted.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/(M G UMA) JUDGE
SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C should be dismissed as infructuous due to pending trial court proceedings and non-compliance with office objections?
4 provisions across 4 enactments
Sri. Shravan Shetty
State of Karnataka
M G Uma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
