Criminal petition under S.482 Cr.P.C. filed for quashing proceedings under 498A IPC. Petitioner's counsel absent. Court dismissed petition due to non-compliance of objections and repeated default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 306 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
RATHNAMMA W/O. LATE. BYRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1097, 8TH CROSS, BSK 1ST STAGE, 2ND BLOCK, BENGALURU - 560 050.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. N. SREENIVASA MURTHY, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: high court of karnataka
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAJAT SUBRAMANYAM, HCGP FOR R-1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.14035/2017 (IS ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.57/2016) OF HANUMANTHANAGAR P.S., FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 498A, 323, 504, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE XXIV A.C.M.M AT BENGALURU.
THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No
representation even though the matter is passed over twice and called again.
The petition is of the year 2022. Office has raised objections and the same are not complied with even though the matter is listed for the fifth time.
Learned HCGP submits that the charge sheet was filed
long back and the matter is now pending for trial in CC. No.14035/2017.
Submission is placed on record.
Hence, the petition is dismissed .
Sd/(M G UMA) JUDGE
BH
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41
2 issues framed by the court
Whether criminal petition under S.482 Cr.P.C. for quashing proceedings should be allowed in absence of counsel after repeated adjournments.
Whether objection-defects in the petition can be addressed when petitioner is absent.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
RATHNAMMA W/O. LATE. BYRAPPA
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
SMT. BHARATHI .N. W/O. GIRISH PRASAD BYRAPPA
M G UMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
