The High Court dismissed the criminal petition as withdrawn upon the parties' settlement in Lok Adalat, rendering the petition for quashing proceedings under IPC and DP Act infructuous.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2560 OF 2018 (482)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VENKATESH., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. HANUMAIAH H C.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by NARAYANAPPA LAKSHMAMMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M.R. PATIL., HCGP FOR R1; SRI. C.N. RAJU., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM COURTS BELOW AND SET-ASIDE THE ORDER IN C.C.NO.8580/2013 ON THE FILE OF V ACMM COURT, BANGALORE CITY, DATED 21.06.2017 AND FURTHER BE PLEASED TO SET-ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HON'BLE LXXI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT BANGALORE, IN CRL REV.PET.NO.630/2017, DATED 01.03.2018 AND DISCHARGE THE PETITIONERS FOR OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 498(A),506 R/W 34 IPC AND UNDER SECTIONS 3, 4 AND 6 OF D.P.ACT., REGISTERED IN CR.NO.49/2013, OF KAMAKSHIPALYA POLICE STATION, PENDING ON THE FILE OF V ACMM COURT, BANGALORE CITY, IN C.C.NO.8580/2013, FOR THE REASONS STATED ABOVE.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Call for the records from courts below and setaside the order in C.C.No.8580/2013 on the file of V ACMM Court, Bangalore City, dated 21.06.2017 and further be pleased to set-aside the order passed by the Hon'ble LXXI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, at Bangalore, in Crl.Rev.Pet.No.630/2017, dated 01.03.2018 and discharge the petitioners for offences punishable under sections 498(A),506 r/w 34 IPC and under sections 3, 4 and 6 of D.P.Act., registered in Cr.No.49/2013, of Kamakshipalya Police Station, pending on the file of V ACMM Court, Bangalore City, in C.C.No.8580/2013, for the reasons stated above.
learned counsel for the petitioner, which reads as
under;
Memo for Withdrawal
The counsel for petitioners named above most humbly submits that, the parties have settled the matter before the Lok Adalath, withdrawing the case and counter case field before the respective courts hence this petition would not survive for consideration. Therefore, the present petition stands infructuous, and the same may be treated withdrawn as dismissed in the interest of justice.
as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
SR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition seeking discharge should be disposed of in light of a settlement?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Naveen S
Lingaraju
State of Karnataka
Smt.Pushpa K.R. @ Pushpalatha K.R.
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
