Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in an attempt to murder case; he was unnamed in the FIR but implicated via co-accused's statement, with a grievous stab injury and unrecovered knife. The court found he was not entitled to pre-arrest bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2129 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
B. RAJENDRA @ SHYAMU S/O. BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/AT WARD NO.214, 2ND CROSS, UPPAR STREET, CHAMARAJANAGAR, DISTRICT - 571 313
…PETITIONER
Digitally signed by BHARATHI S Location: high court of karnataka
(BY SRI. RAJA .K.P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE BY CHAMARAJANAGAR TOWN P.S. CHAMARAJANAGAR - 571 313 REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (SPP) BANGALORE - 560 001 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M.R. PATIL, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.438 CR.PC. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN CR.NO.163/2023 OF CHAMARAJANAGAR TOWN P.S., CHAMARAJANAGAR FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.341, 323, 504, 506, 307, 114 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) AND CJM COURT CHAMARAJANAGAR.
THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The petitioner-accused is before this Court seeking grant of anticipatory bail in Crime No.163/2023 of Chamarajanagar Town Police Station, pending on the file of the learned Addl.Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) and CJM Court, Chamarajanagara District registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 307, 114 R/w Section 34 of Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC'), on the basis of the first information lodged by the informant Sanjay Kumar.S.
“Whether the petitioner is entitled for grant of bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.?”
My answer to the above point is in ‘negative’ for the following:
R E A S O N S
ORDER
The petition is dismissed .
BH: List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8
Sd/JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to grant of bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
B. Rajendra @ Shyamu S/o Basavaraju
State by Chamarajanagar Town P.S.
M G Uma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
