Petitioner sought bail in a criminal case for offences under IPC and POCSO Act. Counsel for the respondent objected to no effect. Petitioner subsequently sought to withdraw the criminal petition, which the court dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive legal principles were laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2071 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. A N RADHA KRISHNA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAHUL RAI. K., HCGP FOR R1; SRI. R.D.RENUKARADHYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.439 CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.105/2023 REGISTERED BY KANAKAPURA RURAL POLICE STATION, RAMANAGARA FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 376, 504, 506, 306 OF IPC AND SEC. 4 AND 6 OF POCSO ACT PENDING ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA IN SPL.C.NO.130/2023.
THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel Sri R.D.Renukaradhya, submits that he
has already filed vakalat for respondent No.2.
addressing the arguments at length, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition.
Sd/JUDGE
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7
TL
Muthuraju S/O Mahadevu
The State of Karnataka
Victim
M G Uma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
