Petitioners sought to quash an order dated 16.03.2020 in C.C.No.1232/2020 under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Counsel filed a memo for withdrawal and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 201312 OF 2024 [482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)]
BETWEEN:
KANCHANA FARM HOUSE
DR B.R. AMBEDKAR NAGAR, SHARAN SIRASAGI BEHIND HIGH COURT KALABURAGI
Digitally signed by KHAJAAMEEN L MALAGHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DR B.R. AMBEDKAR NAGAR, SHARAN SIRASAGI BEHIND HIGH COURT KALABURAGI
AGE 31 YEARS OCC: HOUSEWIFE
NC: 2024:KHC-K:8370 CRL.P No. 201312 of 2024
R/O BIDAR
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI SHIVAPUTRA S.UDABALKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
REPRESENTED BY HCGP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH
…RESPONDENTS
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS CRIMINAL PETITION AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.03.2020 IN C.C.NO.1232/2020 BY THE V-ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT KALABURAGI VIDE ANNEXURE-C.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
NC: 2024:KHC-K:8370 CRL.P No. 201312 of 2024
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for petitioners has filed a memo for
withdrawal of the petition.
Memo is taken on record.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/(MOHAMMAD NAWAZ) JUDGE
SWK
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8
Mahadev S/o Bhimashya Dhanni
Bharatibai W/o Mahadev Dhanni
Kanishka D/o Mahadev Dhanni
Kanchana @ Mahalaxmi W/o Syed Abhid
The State of Karnataka through Ashok Nagar Police Station, Kalaburagi
Bhagyalata W/o Kapildhwaj Dhanni
MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
