Disposed

Siddaramegowda v. State by K M Doddi Police Station

Karnataka HC1 Oct 2024CRL.P/1956/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought quashing of an FIR under Sections 143, 341, 323, 324, 504 and 506 r/w 149 IPC. During pendency the police filed a charge sheet after investigation. Counsel sought leave to withdraw and challenge the charge sheet instead; liberty was granted.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioners to withdraw the petition and file a fresh challenge against the charge sheet; petition disposed as withdrawn.

Siddaramegowda Vs State by K M Doddi Police Station — Quashing and FIR | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC:41066 CRL.P No. 1956 of 2022

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 1^ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1956 OF 2022

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SIDDARAMEGOWDA S/O MINAKEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS

¶10

OCC: AGRICULTURIST/FARMER

¶11

THAYAMMA @ LINGAMMA W/O SIDDARAMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

¶12

OCC: HOUSE WIFE

¶13

DODDAIDEGOWDA S/O LATE MINAKEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS

¶14

OCC: AGRICULTURIST/FARMER

¶15

SAVITHRAMMA

¶16

Digitally signed by KAVYA G Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶17

W/O HANUMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS OCC: HOUSE WIFE

¶18

RAMESH @ CHIKKAHANUMEGOWDA B M S/O LATE MINAKEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURIST/FARMER

¶19

LATHA W/O CHIKKAHANUMEGOWDA B M @ RAMESH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

¶20

OCC: HOUSE WIFE

¶21

ALL ARE R/AT BIDARAHALLI VILLAGE

¶22

¶23

NC: 2024:KHC:41066 CRL.P No. 1956 of 2022

¶24

CA KERE HOBLI MADDUR TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 422

¶25

…PETITIONERS

¶26

(BY SRI. BASAVAIAH C., ADVOCATE)

¶27

AND:

¶28

STATE BY K M DODDI POLICE STATION MALAVALLI SUB-DIVISION K M DODDI, MADDUR TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 422

¶29

B S KRISHNEGOWDA S/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURIST/FARMER BIDARAHALLI VILLAGE CA KERE HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 422

¶30

…RESPONDENTS

¶31

(BY SRI. THEJESH P., HCGP FOR R1)

¶32

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN FIR.NO.81/2022 DATED 31.01.2022 (31.03.2021) IN CR.NO.27/2022 AS PER ANNEXURE-B, ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND J.M.F.C., MADDUR, SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT POLICE AUTHORITY AGAINST TEH PETITIONERS UNDER THE FALSE ALLEGED COMPLAINT OFFENCE P/U/S 143, 341, 323, 324, 504 AND 506 R/W 149 OF IPC.

¶33

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶34

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶35

ORAL ORDER

¶36

Learned High Court Government Pleader on instructions

¶37

submits that during the pendency of the petition, the police

¶38

after investigation have filed the final report-charge sheet.

¶39

NC: 2024:KHC:41066 CRL.P No. 1956 of 2022

¶40

¶41

In the light of filing of the charge sheet, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition and rise a challenge to the charge sheet.

¶42

Liberty so sought is granted.

¶43

The petition is disposed as withdrawn.

¶44

Sd/(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

¶45

KG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 102

Siddaramegowda v. State by K M Doddi Police Station

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Siddaramegowda v. State by K M Doddi Police Station

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh K G Vs State of Karnataka

Amar@ Kiran Kumar .T Vs State of Karnataka

Ramesh Goel Vs State of Karnataka

Mr. Vikram v Kathavate Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. M. Shankara Reddy Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri.B.S. Anilkumar Vs State of Karnataka