Parveen Taj v. State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a filing under Section 482 CrPC for non-prosecution in the absence of representation and non-compliance of a prior order.
The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a filing under Section 482 CrPC for non-prosecution in the absence of representation and non-compliance of a prior order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 178 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
W/O INAYATH ULLA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS.
Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.280 9TH MAIN ROAD NEW BAGALUR LAYOUT BENGALURU NORTH ST. THOMAS TOWN BENGALURU – 560 084.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SMT.SUJATHA V., ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI HARISH GANAPATHI, HCGP FOR R-1)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.35573/2021 OF SANJAY NAGAR P.S., PENDING BEFORE THE VIII ACMM, BANGALORE FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 498A R/W 34 OF IPC AND 4 OF D.P ACT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
This Court on 29.05.2024 had passed a peremptory
order, which reads as follows:
“A week’s time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the matter would be dismissed for its non-prosecution.”
NC: 2024:KHC:23648 CRL.P No. 178 of 2022
Sd/JUDGE
NVJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1
Parveen Taj
Mohammed Arfath
Mohammed Khaisher Ulla
Inayath Ulla
State of Karnataka
Asma Taj
M. Nagaprassna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court