Appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST (POA) Act against refusal of bail was held not maintainable in view of an earlier observation; appellant sought and obtained leave to withdraw with liberty to file a criminal petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:36627 CRL.A No. 1620 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1620 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
MADHU K S/O LATE KRISHNARAJ URS, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT NINGEGOWDANADODDI VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT-562159
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. KANTHARAJAPPA. M. G., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by YAMUNA K L Location: High Court of Karnataka
AND:
S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC: LABOURER, R/AT CHIKKABILLAKEMPANAHALLI, BIDADI HOBLI,
NC: 2024:KHC:36627 CRL.A No. 1620 of 2024
RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT-562159
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RANGASWAMY. R., HCGP)
THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S 14(A)(2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT, 2015 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED I ADDL. DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT RAMANAGARA IN CRL.MISC.NO.971/2023 DATED 29.11.2023 AND GRANT BAIL TO THE APPELLANT IN CR.NO.19/2022 IN RESPECT OF IN SPL.C.NO.52/2022 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 363, 376 OF PC AND U/S 4 AND 6 OF POCSO ACT, AND U/S 9 OF CHILD MARRIAGE ACT, 2006 AND U/S 3(1)(w)(i), 3(2)(v) OF SC/ST (PA) AMENDMENT ACT, 2015, PRESENTLY PENDING ON THE FILE OF I ADDL. DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT RAMANAGARA IN SPL.C.NO.52/2022.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
ORAL JUDGMENT
Office has raised an objection regarding
maintainability of this appeal.
NC: 2024:KHC:36627 CRL.A No. 1620 of 2024
appeal is not maintainable and therefore, the office objection is upheld.
of the Court to withdraw the appeal and file criminal petition before this Court.
5. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn .
copies of the documents furnished along with the appeal as well as the vakalath to the learned counsel forthwith, to enable him to file a petition before this Court.
Sd/(MOHAMMAD NAWAZ) JUDGE
LDC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Madhu K
State by Police Sub Inspector Ramanagara Women Police
Shivanna
Mohammad Nawaz
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
