Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash FIR under Sections 498A, 506 IPC and Sections 3, 4 Dowry Prohibition Act was dismissed for non-compliance of office objections, counsel being repeatedly absent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1291 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: high court of karnataka
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. LANKESH .L., ADVOCATE)
AND:
NC: 2024:KHC:37952 CRL.P No. 1291 of 2020
ALANAHALLI MYSURU - 570 010.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. N. ANITHA GIRISH, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE CR.NO.126/2019 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 498A AND 506 READ WITH 34 OF IPC AND SECTIONS 3 AND 4 OF D.P. ACT PENDING BEFORE THE IV ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) AND J.M.F.C., MYSURU IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent. No
representation even when the matter is passed over twice and again called at 3.30 p.m.
of office objections.
"The learned counsel for petitioners is absent. No representation.
The petition is filed in the year 2020. The office objections raised on the same are not
complied with even though the same is listed for 3rd time, I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter.
However, to afford final opportunity, list after one week."
appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition.
Hence, the petition is dismissed for non compliance of
office objections.
Sd/(M G UMA) JUDGE
*bgn/CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8
1 issue framed by the court
Should the criminal petition be dismissed for non-compliance with office objections despite repeated listing?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Smt. Hema @ Hemavathi A.V
Smt. Vijayalakshmi
Smt. Swamy A.V
State by Women Police Station Mysuru
Pavithra
M G Uma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
