Petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of an FIR and charge sheet for offences including Sections 409 and 420 IPC was dismissed for non-prosecution after petitioners' counsel repeatedly failed to appear and office objections remained uncomplied with despite a last chance.
None; petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:45889 CRL.P No. 1211 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1211 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
ALSO AT NO. 10, 24TH MAIN, J.P. NAGAR 5TH STAGE, BANGALORE-78.
Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: high court of karnataka
ALSO AT NO. 192/02, 24TH MAIN 7TH CROSS, VINAYAKA NAGAR J.P. NAGAR, 5TH STAGE BANGALORE-78.
ALSO AT NO. 12, 21ST MAIN
NC: 2024:KHC:45889 CRL.P No. 1211 of 2022
ANJANAYA REDDY LAYOUT, J.P. NAGAR 5TH STAGE, BANGALORE-78
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. K. SREEDHAR, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. RASHMI JADHAV, ADDL. SPP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.169/2021 AND SPL.C.C.NO.2048/2021 CHARGE SHEET REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT JAYANAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU, DATED 09.08.2021 AND ON 20.11.2021 RESPECTIVELY PENDING BEFORE THE PRL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT, BENGALURU CITY AGAINST THE PETITIONERS FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 409,420,418,120B R/W 34 OF IPC AND SEC.21 OF BUDS ACT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
NC: 2024:KHC:45889 CRL.P No. 1211 of 2022
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent. No
representation.
The order sheet dated 22.10.2024 reads as under:
"Learned Counsel for the petitioners is absent. No representation.
The petition is of the year 2022. Matter is listed for the third time for compliance of office objections. Still there is no progress in the matter. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition.
Finally, as a last chance, a week's time is granted to comply with the office objections ."
Inspite of that the office objections are not complied with
even when the matter is listed for the fourth time. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition.
Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/(M G UMA) JUDGE
BH: List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Lokesh Aliyas Rakesh
Vasudevan
Bala Chandra Raju
State by Jayanagar Police Station, Bengaluru
Pavan Kumar .N.N
M G Uma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
