Dismissed

Mr. Abdul Hameed v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC21 Mar 2024CRL.P/11899/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought quashing of criminal proceedings for offences including Section 307 IPC; counsel withdrew the petition seeking liberty to move a discharge application before the trial court. Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty and a direction that the discharge application be decided on merits.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to seek discharge before trial court, to be considered on merits uninfluenced by this order.

Mr. Abdul Hameed Vs the State of Karnataka — Quashing and FIR | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC:11755 CRL.P No.11899 of 2022

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF MARCH, 2024 BEFORE

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE CRIMINAL PETITION NO.11899 OF 2022

¶5

BETWEEN:

¶6

MR. ABDUL HAMEED

¶7

S/O LATE ABDUL ALEEM @ BADESAB AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT WARD NO.17 IMADIYA MOHALLA KUNIGAL TOWN, KUNIGAL TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 130.

¶8

Digitally signed by C HONNUR SAB Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶9

MR. ABDUL ALEEM S/O LATE ABUDL HAMEED AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS R/AT WARD NO.17 IMADIYA MOHALLA KOTE KUNIGAL TOWN, KUNGIAL TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 130.

¶10

MR. BARKATH PASHA @ BARKATH S/O BABAJAN AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT WARD NO.16 IMADIYA MOHALLA KUNIGAL TOWN, KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 130.

¶11

MR. WASEEM PASHA S/O MUNAVAR PASHA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT WARD NO.17 IMADIYA MOHALLA KOTE KUNIGAL TOWN, KUNIGAL TALUK TUMAKUR DISTRICT-572 130.

¶12

2 - NC: 2024:KHC:11755 CRL.P No.11899 of 2022

¶13

MR. MUNAVAR PASHA S/O ABDUL RAZA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT WARD NO.17 IMADIYA MOHALLA KOTE KUNIGAL TOWN, KUNIGAL TALUK TUMAKUR DISTRICT-572 130.

¶14

…PETITIONERS

¶15

(BY SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADV., FOR SRI. P.M. SIDDAMALLAPPA, ADV.,)

¶16

AND:

¶17

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY KUNIGAL POLICE STATION KUNIGAL TOWN, KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT REP. THROUGH SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR GOVT. OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU 560 001.

¶18

MR. ELYAZ KHAN S/O OF EAJAJ KHAN AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT KOTE BADAVANE, KOTE KUNIGAL TOWN TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 130.

¶19

…RESPONDENTS

¶20

(BY SRI. M.R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1 SRI. A. MAHESH CHOWDHARY, ADV., FOR R2)

¶21

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN C.C. NO.7703/2022 ON THE FILE OF LEARNED PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNIGAL. QUASH THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS INITIATED IN C.C.NO.7703/2022 BEFORE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNIGAL, FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 307, 323, 324, 504 AND 506 READ WITH SECTION 149 OF IPC IN CRIME NO.18/2022 OF KUNIGAL POLICE STATION AS PER ANNEXURE-C AND ETC.

¶22

¶23

NC: 2024:KHC:11755 CRL.P No.11899 of 2022

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶25

ORDER

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing for

¶27

sometime, submits that he would withdraw the petition and seeks liberty to move an application for discharge before the trial Court.

¶28

Submission is placed on record.

¶29

Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Petitioners

¶30

are at liberty to move an application for discharge before

¶31

the trial Court. If such an application is filed, the same

¶32

shall be considered on merits without being influenced by

¶33

the petition being dismissed as withdrawn.

¶34

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2

¶35

Sd/JUDGE

¶36

BSR

Mr. Abdul Hameed v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Abdul Hameed v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The President Vs Sri N G Raju

Smt. B. L. Geetha Vs Smt. Prabhakumari

Sri Shankarappa Vs Smt P Mahadevamma @ Devamma

G T Prasanna Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. A.P. Ranjith Vs the State of Karnataka

Varun Chopra an Indian Vs Shyam Sunder Chopra and Sons HUF