Petitioners sought quashing of a show cause notice issued by the Tahsildar under a Magisterial proceeding. The High Court upheld the office objection on maintainability and dismissed the petition as not maintainable, reserving liberty to seek appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11571 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KUNIGAL TOWN, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572130
(BY SRI. SIDDAMALLAPPA P M, ADVOCATE)
AND:
KUNIGAL TALUK, KUNIGAL TOWN TUMKURU DISTRICT-572130 REPRESENTED THROUGH SPP GOVERNMENT OF KARANTAKA HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU-560001
TUMKUR DISTRICT-572130 (WRONGLY MENTIONED)
…RESPONDENTS
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASHED THE IMPUGNED SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED: NIL ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN CASE MAG(C) MIS 98/2023-24 AS PER ANNEXURE-A WITH CONCERN TO THE PETITIONERS ARE CONCERN AND ALLOW THIS CRIMINAL PETITION WITH EXEMPLARY COSTS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Office objection in regard to maintainability of
criminal petition is upheld.
Sd/JUDGE
ALB
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 66
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is maintainable to quash a show cause notice issued by the Tahsildar-cum-Taluk Executive Magistrate?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Barkath Pasha
Sri Imran Pasha
Sri Chand Peer
The Tahsildar cum Taluk Executive Magistrate, Kunigal Taluk
The State of Karnataka by Kunigal Town Police Station
Mr Peter Jams
Sachin Shankar Magadum
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
