Raghupathi v. State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Counsel for petitioners moved a memo seeking permission to withdraw criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash an order dismissing discharge applications. The court allowed withdrawal of the petition and consequent disposal of the interim application.
What did the court decide?
Petition allowed for withdrawal. Impugned order remained but petition disposed of as withdrawn. I.A.No.1/2023 disposed as consequential.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
NC: 2024:KHC:51805 CRL.P No. 1149 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1149 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
- RAGHUPATHI
S/O K.Y.MUNIVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
R/O KAVATHANAHALLI VILLAGE MULBAGAL TALUKA
KOLAR DISTRICT – 563 131.
- ESHWARAMMA
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition seeking quash of impugned order should be allowed or dismissed given the withdrawal of petition by counsel.
Whether the associated interim application I.A.No.1/2023 requires separate disposal given the withdrawal of main petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAGHUPATHI S/O K.Y.MUNIVENKATAPPA
- petitioner
ESHWARAMMA W/O RAGHUPATHI
- petitioner
K.R.SUNIL S/O K.N.RAMESH
- petitioner
K.S.KARTHIK S/O K.M.SOMASHEKAR
- petitioner
K.M.SOMASHEKAR S/O K.Y.MUNIVENKATAPPA
- petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.P/1149/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court