Partly allowed

Akshay H G v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC20 Nov 2024CRL.P/107/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal PETITION before the High Court of Karnataka concerning the quashing of an FIR filed under IPC sections 506, 34, 504, 323, and 354. The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the criminal petition. The interlocutory application was disposed of as a consequence.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the criminal petition with liberty to challenge the charge sheet and proceedings.

Akshay H G Vs State of Karnataka — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC:46991 CRL.P No. 107 of 2023

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 20^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 107 OF 2023

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

AKSHAY H. G., D/O H.N.GIREESH

¶9

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT NO.188, 10^TH MAIN 9^TH BLOCK, NAGARABHAVI 2^ND STAGE, BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU – 560 072.

¶10

AMAR SINGH AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT NO.158, 7^TH ‘B’ MAIN ROAD NEAR MAYURA CONDIMENTS RPC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR

¶11

HAMPINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 104.

¶12

Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

VARSHA A.SINGH D/O B.AMAR SINGH AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/AT NO.158, 7^TH ‘B’ MAIN ROAD NEAR MAYURA CONDIMENTS RPC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR HAMPINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 104.

¶14

PRERANA SINGH D/O B.AMAR SINGH AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS R/AT NO.158, 7^TH ‘B’ MAIN ROAD

¶15

¶16

NC: 2024:KHC:46991 CRL.P No. 107 of 2023

¶17

NEAR MAYURA CONDIMENTS RPC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR HAMPINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 104.

¶18

…PETITIONERS

¶19

(BY SRI MOHANKUMARA D., ADVOCATE)

¶20

AND:

¶21

STATE OF KARNATAKA

¶22

BY CHANDRA LAYOUT POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT COMPLEX BENGALURU – 560 001.

¶23

2. RENUKA

¶24

W/O SHIVARAJ AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT NO.1583, 39^TH CROSS ’D’ GROUP LAYOUT SRI GANDHADA KAVAL ANNAPOORNESWARA LAYOUT BENGALURU CITY – 560 091.

¶25

…RESPONDENTS

¶26

(BY SRI B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL. SPP FOR R1; R2 IS SERVED, BUT UNREPRESENTED)

¶27

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF THE CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.355/2022 REGISTERED BY THE CHANDRA LAYOUT POLICE STATION FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S.506, 34, 504, 323, 354 OF IPC ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED 8th ADDITIONAL CMM COURT BENGALURU CITY.

¶28

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶29

¶30

NC: 2024:KHC:46991 CRL.P No. 107 of 2023

¶31

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶32

ORAL ORDER

¶33

Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking

¶34

permission to withdraw the petition.

¶35

The memo reads as follows:

¶36

“MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL

¶37

The undersigned counsel for the petitioner, most respectfully prays this Hon’ble Court to permit me to withdraw the above case with the liberty to challenge the charge sheet and entire proceedings in interest of justice and equity.”

¶38

In terms of the memo, the criminal petition is disposed as

¶39

withdrawn.

¶40

I.A.No.1/2023 is also disposed, as a consequence.

¶41

Sd/(M.NAGAPRASANNA)

¶42

JUDGE

¶43

NVJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15 CT:SS

Akshay H G v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akshay H G v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Nagaraju D M Vs State of Karnataka

Axis Bank Ltd. Vs the State of Karnataka

Mr Lokesh K v Vs State of Karnataka

Mutta Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. K. B. Gopalakrishna Vs State of Karnataka

Sri K B Shivalinge Gowda @ K B S Gowda Vs Smt M C Shobha @ Sumitha