Puneeth Kumar C v. the State of Karnataka by
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed the petition for bail due to the absence of the petitioner's counsel and non-payment of process fees for issuing notice to the co-respondent.
The court dismissed the petition for bail due to the absence of the petitioner's counsel and non-payment of process fees for issuing notice to the co-respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:9345 CRL.P No. 1063 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1063 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
PUNEETH KUMAR C, S/O LATE CHANDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/A MARALUBAGILU, BEHIND MILK DAIRY, DEVANAHALLI TOWN, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MANJUNATH M.R, ADVOCATE (ABSENT) )
AND:
Digitally signed by SOWMYA D Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.220/2023 OF DEVANAHALLI P.S., BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 376(2)(n) AND 305 OF IPC AND SEC.6 OF POCSO ACT PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE FTSC-3 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Considering these aspects, the petition stands dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
URN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21 CT: BHK
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Puneeth Kumar C
The State of Karnataka
Smt. Shoba K
Rajendra Badamikar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court