week's time to take necessary steps for the issuance of notice. Subsequently, on 10.06.2024, at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, another week's time was granted to do the needful. Again on 25.06.2024, a week's time was granted to do the needful. When the matter was listed on 09.07.2024, none appeared for the petitioner and another week's time was granted to do the needful. Similarly, on 19.07.2024, when the matter was listed, none appeared for the petitioner and a final week's time was granted to do the needful. On 01.08.2024, when the matter was called out, none appeared for the petitioner. Consequently, the matter was directed to be listed on 05.08.2024, at the top of the list, under the caption 'dismissal'. Even on 05.08.2024, when the matter was posted under the caption 'dismissal', none appeared for the petitioner.