Husband sought transfer of wife's matrimonial case from Malur to Anekal where she had shifted residence. Wife undertook not to seek adjournments. The court disposed of the petition directing the Malur court to conclude the case within six months and the wife to proceed without adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
CIVIL PETITION NO. 16 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SRI KARTHIK B S S/O SRI B N SRINIVASA REDDY AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 8 3RD FLOOR, 12TH CROSS MARUTHI NAGAR, MADIWALA BENGALURU - 560068.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. BHARATH K.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SMT SANDHYA H R D/O SRI RAMASWAMY REDDY W/O KARTHIK B S AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS CURRENTLY RESIDING AT NO 109, D S MAX SILVER WOOD APARTMENTS BOMMASANDRA VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK 560099
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. MEGHA CHANDRA D.N.,ADVOCATE)
THIS CIVIL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 24 OF CPC, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND ISSUE AN ORDER TO THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MALUR IN M.C. NO. 36/2018, I.E., ANNEXURE A, BY TRANSFERRING THE SAID CASE TO THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT ANEKAL TO TRY AND DISPOSE OF THE SAID MATRIMONIAL CASE FILED BY THE RESPONDENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND GRANT SUCH OTHER ORDERS AS THIS HONBLE COURT DEEMS FIT IN
NC: 2024:KHC:33470 CP No. 16 of 2024
THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
NC: 2024:KHC:33470 CP No. 16 of 2024
that the matter is currently before the trial Court for further cross-examination of PW-1. The respondent-wife will not seek any adjournments in the case and therefore, the matter can be heard and disposed of in the Malur Court itself. Hence, he sought for dismissal of the petition.
ORDER
Sd/(H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE
HA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5
1 issue framed by the court
Should M.C.No.36/2018 pending at Malur be transferred to Anekal for the convenience of the parties?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Karthik B S
Smt Sandhya H R
H.T. Narendra Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
