Disposed

Mr Abhishek Kumar v. M/S. Sorting Hat Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Karnataka HC17 Dec 2024COMAP/36/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Commercial Appeal filed under the Commercial Court Act and Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The Court allowed the appeal to be closed after the respondent filed a memo stating the parties had settled their dispute via a new marketing agreement post-hearing.

What did the court decide?

The appeal is closed; liberty granted to revive if any cause survives; pending IAs disposed of.

Mr Abhishek Kumar Vs M/S. Sorting Hat… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

1 - NC: 2024:KHC:52017-DB COMAP No. 36 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 17^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 36 OF 2023

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

MR. ABHISHEK KUMAR, S/O LATE MR. ANIL KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/AT HOUSE NO. 31/32, SIYA RAM SADAN, OPP. POLICE STATION, DANAPUR CANT., PATNA-801 504.

¶10

…APPELLANT

¶11

(BY SRI. ABHISHEK KUMAR, ADVOCATE (COURT NOTICE SERVED))

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by K G RENUKAMBA Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

M/S. SORTING HAT TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 2013, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: MUATHI INFOTECH CENTRE, 3^RD FLOOR, A-BLOCK, DOMLUR, KORMANGALA, INNER RING ROAD, BENGALURU -560 071.

¶15

…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. AMRUTHA B.R, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. KASHYAP .N NAIK, ADVOCATE)

¶16

THIS COMMERCIAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1A) OF THE COMMERCIAL COURT ACT, 2015 R/W SECTION 37(1)(b) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996. PRAYING TO SET ASODE THE ORDER DATED 17^TH DECEMBER

¶17

¶18

NC: 2024:KHC:52017-DB COMAP No. 36 of 2023

¶19

2022 PASSED BY THE LEARNED LXXXIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE(CCH-90) IN THE COMMERCIAL COURT DIVISION, BENGALURU IN COM.A.A.NO.597 OF 2022 AND ETC.

¶20

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶21

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO and

¶22

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

¶23

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶24

(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO)

¶25

Learned counsel for the respondent states that the

¶26

respondent has settled the issue with the appellant.

¶27

On the last date of hearing, we adjourned the

¶28

matter for today (i.e., 17.12.2024), as the report of the Registry suggest that, service on the respondent is still awaited.

¶29

We also note, the respondent has filed a memo dated 16.07.2024, which reads as under:

¶30

“MEMO FILED BY THE RESPONDENT

¶31

The above-named Respondent humbly submits in view of the negotiations which transpired between the parties, the Appellant and the Respondent have entered into an

¶32

3 - NC: 2024:KHC:52017-DB COMAP No. 36 of 2023

¶33

Educator Agreement - Marketing and Promotion dated 17.03.2023, wherein the Appellant has agreed to continue to provide services to the Respondent. A copy of the Educator Agreement - Marketing and Promotion dated 17.03.2023 is produced herewith as Document No. 1.

¶34

Wherefore, it is humbly submitted that the instant memo, along with the document may be kindly taken on record and appropriate orders may be passed in light of the settlement, in the interest of justice and equity.“

¶35

In view of the fact that, the parties have settled the

¶36

dispute, the present appeal is closed.

¶37

Liberty is granted to the appellant, if any cause survives to revive the appeal.

¶38

Pending IAs if any, stands disposed of.

¶39

Sd/(V KAMESWAR RAO) JUDGE

¶40

Sd/(S RACHAIAH) JUDGE

¶41

SMC/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13

Mr Abhishek Kumar v. M/S. Sorting Hat Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr Abhishek Kumar v. M/S. Sorting Hat Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pr.Commmissioner of Income TAX-5 Vs M/S Opto Circuits (India) Ltd.

The Pr Commissioner of Income Tax, Vs M/S Hemavathy Power and Light Pvt. Ltd.

The Pr Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/S Hemavathy Power and Light Pvt. Ltd.

Audit-I Commissionerate Vs M/S Thinkhigh Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Sri. Vimal Jain (Kataria) Vs M/S. Bindu Properties

M/S Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Ltd. Vs M/S Kirby Building Systems and Structures Pvt. Ltd.